Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Happy Voter's avatar

I don't understand. They were offered $10 million they could have spent on this and loudmouths said they didn't want "Biden money" -- but then they did take $8 million and spent it on the sheriff's department even though it was "Biden money."

So since they did take money, that sounds like they were willing to take the money, but just prioritized their sheriff's department instead of potential flood victims.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Fenlon's avatar

Your reporting and analyses are excellent, Kahlil. And you cite sources. Who else does that? Bravo.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts